纽约夜月情
人气TOP 3 喜剧片
10.0 1993 美国 正片
纽约夜月情夜月情追剧38内曼离婚率
10.0
网友评分
  • 很差
  • 较差
  • 还行
  • 推荐
  • 力荐
227次评分
  • 很差
  • 较差
  • 还行
  • 推荐
  • 力荐
为影片《纽约夜月情》评分
导演:Warren Leight
描述:Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and
展开

同演员出演

同导演作品

同类型推荐

✨ 《纽约夜月情》高能弹幕问答区

1
请问哪个平台可以免费在线观看《纽约夜月情》?
🔥 免VIP直达
秋霞影院 网友倾情指路:高清无码在线观看传送门在这里 👉 https://www.zhhbnj.com/qxyyplay/54419-1-1.html
2
《纽约夜月情》都有哪些神仙演员参演?
网友情报局:本片主演阵容简直神仙打架,包括:Matthew Broderick,Jeanne Tripplehorn,Tim 等实力派大咖!
3
这部片子是什么时候上映 / 开播的呀?
吃瓜网友:本作于 1993 年重磅上映!更详细的剧集周边和八卦可以去 百度百科 扒一扒。
4
看片的时候如果画面一直转圈卡顿怎么办?急!
贴吧大神
百度贴吧 老哥支招:遇到卡顿别慌,反手就是一个刷新网页,或者拉到播放器下面更换其他超清播放源,分分钟解决!
5
手机版免费在线点播《纽约夜月情》还有哪些资源站?
热心网友:除了本站,其他正版大佬平台也有哦:芒果TV爱奇艺优酷视频百度视频
6
大家对《纽约夜月情》的真实评价怎么样?排雷还是安利?
Mtime时光网 网友: 比第一部好看,剧情不磨叽了,主要角色不拖后腿。第一次看到《纽约夜月情》直接就爱了。
百度视频 网友: 电影前的回忆闪回让观众们完美过渡,没看过前作的朋友也毫无压力,相比第一部演员有所升级。
豆瓣电影 网友: 感太割裂了,一边频频被视觉设计上的创意惊艳到,一边又不知道导演在吃力地表达什么!抛开所有片外因素,这部片子我看得很爽。
👑
本站硬核推荐理由
站长实名打Call
《纽约夜月情》绝对是一部非常值得观看的 喜剧片 神作!于 1993-04-30 上映,由著名导演 Warren Leight 亲自操刀。演员阵容极度逆天,比如我们耳熟能详的 Matthew Broderick,Jeanne Tripplehorn,Tim Guinee 等等。

影片主要讲述了:Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and。故事情节跌宕起伏,很多看过的网友都给这部喜剧片打出了高达 10.0 的评分。如果你还在苦苦寻找《纽约夜月情》的高清完整版,别找了,直接在咱们这儿免费开看!
  • 片名:纽约夜月情
  • 状态:正片
  • 主演:Matthew Broderick Jeanne Tripplehorn Tim Guinee 
  • 导演:Warren Leight 
  • 年份:1993
  • 地区:美国
  • 类型:喜剧 爱情 
  • 频道:内详
  • 上映:1993-04-30
  • 语言:英语
  • 更新:2026-05-16 17:34
  • 简介:Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
本地记录 云端记录